Showing posts with label heart. Show all posts
Showing posts with label heart. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 20, 2008

B vitamins fail to curb risks in heart patients

Reducing levels of the amino acid homocysteine with folic acid and B vitamins failed to prevent serious complications in patients with heart disease, Norwegian researchers said on Tuesday.

The study was the latest of several large trials to show that lowering homocysteine through vitamin therapy offered no benefit to people with heart disease.

Other research had found a link between high concentrations of homocysteine in the blood and heart attacks and strokes.

But the researchers said the failure of their study and others like it suggests that homocysteine may be a marker for heart risks, and not a cause.

"Our findings do not support the use of B vitamins as secondary prevention in patients with coronary artery disease," Dr. Marta Ebbing of Haukeland University Hospital in Bergen, Norway, and colleagues wrote in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

Ebbing's team studied 3,096 patients with coronary artery disease in two Norwegian hospitals between 1999 and 2006 who were having procedures to remove blood clots that were blocking the flow of blood to the heart.

They divided patients into four groups, testing different combinations of B6 and B12 vitamins with or without folic acid. The vitamins were given in addition to other treatments.

Patients were scheduled for follow-up visits with an interview, clinical examination and blood sampling at one month, one year, and at a final study visit.

The study was stopped early because preliminary results from a similar study in Norway found no benefits from the therapy and an increased risk of cancer associated with B vitamins.

Based on the data they collected, Ebbing and colleagues found no sign that a combination of folic acid plus vitamin B12 or B6 helped reduce the risk of death or major heart events, such as heart attacks or strokes.

They did find a trend toward fewer strokes and a higher risk of cancer in groups receiving folic acid, but they said the numbers were not statistically significant.




For more information visit http://www.jigfo.com, the no.1 source of information.

Wednesday, July 30, 2008

Secondhand smoke risks spouse's life


Nonsmokers married to smokers have a greatly increased chance of having strokes, according to a U.S. study published on Tuesday showing yet another hazard from secondhand smoke.

Being married to a smoker raised the stroke risk by 42 percent in people who have never smoked compared to those married to someone who never smoked, the researchers said.

This jumped to 72 percent for former smokers married to a current smoker, according to the study published in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine.

Former smokers who were married to smokers had a stroke risk similar to people who themselves were smokers.

"Quitting smoking helps your own health and also the health of the people living with you," Maria Glymour of Harvard School of Public Health in Boston and Columbia University in New York, who led the study, said in a telephone interview.

The study involved 16,225 people aged 50 and up who had never had a stroke. They were followed for an average of nine years.

Glymour said there is accumulating evidence about the number of health problems linked to secondhand smoke.

Previous research had suggested that secondhand smoke increases the risk of stroke, but Glymour said stroke risk has been studied more extensively in smokers than in people exposed to secondhand smoke.

People who breathe in secondhand smoke also have a higher risk of lung cancer, nasal sinus cancer, respiratory tract infections and heart disease, among other conditions.

A 2006 U.S. surgeon general's report said secondhand smoke contains hundreds of chemicals known to be toxic or cancer-causing. These include formaldehyde, benzene, vinyl chloride, arsenic, ammonia and hydrogen cyanide.

For this study, smoking involved cigarettes and not pipes or cigars. It looked at health consequences for the spouses of smokers, but not at the long-term stroke risk in children of smokers due to secondhand smoke.

"We know that there are a lot of undesirable health consequences for kids, especially asthma and breathing problems that are exacerbated by secondhand smoke," Glymour said.



For more information visit http://www.jigfo.com, the no.1 source of information.

Cholesterol

CHOLESTEROL IS A LIPID, OR FAT-LIKE SUBSTANCE,
made by animal cells. The role of an elevated blood
cholesterol in causing a blockage to arteries by atherosclerosis
and a subsequent myocardial infarction was a
controversial issue from 1900 to 1994. Advice to patients
during those 90 years was often half-hearted. Until recently
we were not able to put the blame firmly on cholesterol
and convince physicians and patients worldwide to
aggressively lower serum cholesterol levels. The key piece
of scientific evidence proving that lowering elevated blood
cholesterol in humans prevents fatal or nonfatal heart
attacks was missing.

I. THE MAGNITUDE OF THE PROBLEM
If cholesterol is the major cause of atheroma that obstructs
the flow of blood in arteries of the heart and brain,
significant morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular
disease would be prevented by the aggressive lowering of
total serum cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)
cholesterol. The complete occlusion of a coronary artery or
cerebral artery is virtually always caused by a combination
of atheromatous obstruction of the artery and subsequent
rupture of the plaque of atheroma with thrombus
formation on the ruptured material. Thus, the term
atherothrombosis (see the chapter, Atherosclerosis/Atherothrombosis).
Atherothrombotic cardiovascular disease causes more
than 14 million deaths per year worldwide in a population
of about 6 billion people. This is expected to increase to
more than 25 million deaths by the year 2020 in a
population of about 7.4 billion people. It is estimated
that worldwide interventions could prevent more than
one million deaths annually. The prevention of atheroma
is obviously more important to world health than
the expensive production of so-called left ventricular assist
devices, which are a bridge to heart transplantation.

CAUSES OF HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA
A. Familial Hypercholesterolemia
This is a primary genetic abnormality. In very rare cases,
marked elevation of cholesterol (800–1500 mg/dl) is caused
by a genetic defect. A receptor on the surface of cells (LDL
receptors) removes LDL cholesterol from the blood. In
this disorder there is decreased production or function of
the LDL receptor. This autosomal disorder may involve
abnormalities in the synthesis, transport, or clustering of
the LDL receptor.

Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia fortunately
is rare and occurs in approximately one per million
individuals in the United States. These patients have no
functioning LDL receptors and have markedly elevated
LDL cholesterol as high as 1200 mg/dl (31 mmol/L)
and extensive coronary and peripheral atherosclerosis.
Acute MI may occur within the first one to two years of
childhood.

Heterozygotes have a reduction of 50% of the circulating
LDL receptors and may have serum cholesterol
levels in the range of 300–800 mg/dl and manifest coronary
artery atherothrombosis, peripheral vascular disease,
or atheromatous obstruction to the abdominal aorta in
the third or fourth decade. Racial differences may determine
the number of LDL receptors, and thus the ability
to remove LDL cholesterol gradually from the bloodstream
is affected.

Familial combined hyperlipidemia is a common condition
that occurs in more than 1% of the North American
population. This disorder may cause elevation of total
cholesterol or triglycerides or both.

B. Polygenic Hypercholesterolemia
In this condition there is a genetic predisposition and
dietary factors. In susceptible individuals with a decreased
number of LDL receptors, high saturated fat and
cholesterol intake causes substantial elevation of serum
cholesterol with levels in range of 260–320 mg/dl
(6.5–8.3 mmol/L). Approximately 3% of the population
in the United States appears to be affected. Although
elevation in total cholesterol is less severe than in heterozygous
familial hypercholesterolemia, the elevation of total
and LDL cholesterol increases risk for coronary artery
disease and drug therapy with statins is advisable.
C. Other Causes for Hypercholesterolemia
Type 2 diabetes occurs in approximately 7% of the North
American population and nearly all of these individuals
have some form of dyslipidemia. Their serum cholesterol is
usually in the range of 240–290 mg/dl (6.2–7.5 mmol/L).
Hypothyroidism is a relatively common condition that
decreases the metabolism with increases in serum cholesterol
in the range of 240–320 mg/dl.

Renal disease can also affect cholesterol levels. A form of
glomerulonephritis causes marked loss of protein in the
urine, diffuse edema, and hypercholesterolemia. Biliary
cirrhosis with its prolonged obstructive jaundice causes
marked elevation in serum cholesterol. Other causes include
pancreatitis, monoclonal gammopathy, and porphyria.

IV. TYPES OF CHOLESTEROL
Cholesterol is a member of a class of naturally occurring
compounds called sterols. It is an essential part of the
fatty sheath that insulates nerves and the outer membrane
of all animal cells, and is a component of chemicals that
include steroids (cortisone) and sex hormones such as
androgens and estrogens. Cholesterol acts as a precursor
of bile acids and occurs in high concentrations in the
brain, nerves, and adrenal glands; cholesterol concentration
is greater than 3 g per 100 g in the brain. Body cells
satisfy their cholesterol requirements for maintenance
and growth by intracellular synthesis of cholesterol and
the receptor-mediated uptake from the external medium
of cholesterol-rich LDL particles.

Dietary cholesterol is absorbed from the jejunum in
an unesterified form. Within the small intestine cholesterol
is esterified with fatty acids and incorporated into the
triglyceride core of chylomicrons that are secreted into
the intestinal lymphatics and reach the blood circulation.
Within the bloodstream chylomicrons are converted
into remnant particles through the action of lipoprotein
lipase. Triglycerides are liberated and virtually all the cholesterol
particles are carried to the liver via the portal vein.
Less than half the cholesterol in the diet is absorbed. It is
interesting that after many years intensive drug research,
ezetimibe, the newest agent, has been shown to localize in
the distal and at the brush border cells of the small intestine
and inhibit cholesterol absorption. This drug is,
therefore, an important addition to our therapeutic armamentarium
because it can be combined safety with the
powerful acting statins that interfere with the manufacture
of cholesterol in the liver.

The human body and contains approximately 1 g of
cholesterol per kilogram body weight. About 1 g of cholesterol
is lost from the body by the conversion to bile
acids and steroid hormones. This loss is balanced by endogenous
synthesis from saturated fats and fecal excretion of
unabsorbed dietary cholesterol.

Some of the cholesterol in blood is derived from the
food you eat, but the major part, greater than 70%, is
manufactured in the liver, mainly from saturated fats.
Thus, if we had no cholesterol in the diet, the liver would
manufacture more cholesterol to compensate. Some excess
cholesterol is excreted in the bile. Cholesterol is present
only in foods of animal origin, in particular, eggs, milk,
butter, cheese and meats, and a very high concentration
is present in gland meats, such as liver, brain, kidney,
heart, and sweetbreads. Plant-based foods such as potatoes,
wheat, rice, vegetables, fruits, grains, and beans contain no
cholesterol.

In order to understand the changes that may be required
in your diet, it is important to learn the difference
between the types of cholesterol: total cholesterol, LDL
cholesterol, and HDL cholesterol. Individuals should
become familiar with the different types of fats in foods
such as triglycerides, saturated fats, monounsaturated fats,
and polyunsaturated fats.

A. Total Cholesterol
Cholesterol is a fat (lipid) that is insoluble in water. It is
absorbed by the intestine or released from the liver into
the bloodstream. Cholesterol does not circulate freely in
solution but is attached to a protein carrier, forming a
molecule called a lipoprotein. Lipoproteins vary in size
and density; the smaller the size, the higher the density.
Cholesterol may be transported in a low-density lipoprotein;
thus the term ‘‘low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol.’’
There is also a high-density lipoprotein (HDL)
cholesterol (see the chapter Dyslipidemia).

When a doctor states that your cholesterol is 250 mg
(6.5 mmol), he is giving you the total amount of cholesterol
in your blood, which includes LDL and HDL
cholesterol. The total figure is not broken down unless
specifically requested by the doctor. The values given in
milligrams are the amount in each 100 ml of blood or
number of millimoles in one liter of blood.

B. Low-Density Lipoprotein (Bad) Cholesterol
The low-density lipoprotein is small and contains most of
the cholesterol that is transported to cells. About 75%
of the blood cholesterol is carried as LDL cholesterol.
The LDL cholesterol particle is the one responsible for
atheroma formation and progression. The higher the level
of LDL cholesterol in the blood, the greater the risk of
coronary heart disease; thus the term ‘‘bad’’ cholesterol.
Oxidation of LDL cholesterol is believed to be an
important process in the formation and progression of
atheroma. It appears that oxidative modification of LDL
causes an increase in foam cell formation and increased
rates of LDL accumulation within developing atheromatous
plaques. In addition, oxidized LDL appears to have
direct cytotoxic effects on the endothelium of arteries at
the site of injury.

Oxidative stress causes oxidation of LDL cholesterol.
Oxidative stress results from the production of reactive
oxygen species, superoxide anion, and hydrogen peroxide
molecules that cause oxidative damage and trigger intracellular
signaling cascades. The constituents of the atheroma
plaque produce and use reactive oxygen species. LDL
cholesterol reduction appears to reduce the production of
deleterious reactive oxygen species.

This author believes that it is unlikely that LDL particles
cause direct injury to normal healthy endothelium,
because the same blood level of LDL cholesterol is present
in veins that virtually never develop atheroma except
when they are exposed to high blood pressure, such as in
severe pulmonary hypertension. It is more likely that shear
stress caused by turbulence of blood at particular focal
points in arteries, particularly at branching areas, and
other factors cause endothelial injury; LDL particles then
just partake in the orchestration of accelerated atheromatous
plaque growth. Increased blood pressure appears
to promote atherogenesis through the mechanical effects
of pulsatile blood flow (see the chapter Atherosclerosis/
Atheroma).

A plasma level of LDL cholesterol greater than
160 mg/dl is associated with a high risk for coronary
artery disease events in susceptible individuals and levels
less than 100 mg/dl confer a low risk. When an individual
is documented as having very-high-risk LDL cholesterol
levels (>200 mg/dl) associated with premature coronary
artery disease, all available first-degree relatives should be
tested.

C. High-Density Lipoprotein (Good)
Cholesterol
Much interest has been focused on HDL cholesterol,
so-called because it is very small in size and very high in
density. HDL cholesterol is believed to carry cholesterol
away from body cells such as the lining of arteries helping
to keep the artery wall clean; thus the term ‘‘good’’
cholesterol.

As discussed earlier most heart attacks occur in individuals
with total cholesterol levels between 210 and 240
mg/dl (5.5 and 6.2 mmol/L), and more than 50% of adult
Americans have cholesterol levels in this range. In these
individuals with borderline high blood cholesterol, a low
level of HDL cholesterol further increases the risk for
coronary artery disease. Figure 1 shows the incidence of
coronary heart disease in four years by HDL cholesterol
and total plasma cholesterol level for men and women
older than 49 and free of cardiovascular disease.

The HDL system comprises a variety of small lipoproteins
smaller than LDL, but both HDL and LDL
particles contain mostly cholesteryl ester. Virtually all HDL
particles contain apoA-1 as their major apolipoprotein and
the particles vary a little in size; the largest particles is HDL
2 and the predominant smaller particle HDL 3.

1. Metabolism
The many steps involved in HDL metabolism are not
fully understood. Small HDL 3 particles accumulate cholesteryl
ester and expand to HDL 2; an important step is
further transformation by interaction with cholesteryl ester
transfer protein (CETP). At each step of the HDL metabolic
cycle some apoA-1 is lost. High levels of CETP turn
up the cycle at a high rate and this diminishes the total
pool size of HDL that is manifested as a lowered HDL
cholesterol level.

It appears that CETP is an important enzyme involved
in HDL biology. Inhibiting this key enzyme that modulates
HDL can raise HDL levels. Vaccines and cardioactive
agents that may increase HDL levels significantly are being
investigated, and there is great hope that major increases in
HDL cholesterol would cause significant protection from
atherothrombosis and its serious impact on morbidity and
mortality worldwide.

2. Effect on Atherosclerosis
Several epidemiologic studies indicate an inverse relationship
between HDL cholesterol levels and risk for coronary
artery disease (see Fig. 1). A low HDL cholesterol level
greater than 35 mg/dl (0.9 mmol/L) has been designated as
a major risk factor for coronary artery disease. It is stated
that every 1% increase in HDL cholesterol decreases coronary
artery disease risk by about 2%, and each 1% reduction
in total cholesterol should produce a 2% reduction in
coronary artery disease risk. In Finland where HDL blood
cholesterol levels are among the highest in the world, the
cardiovascular death rate is the highest of all European
countries (see the chapter Heart Attacks).

Some scientists suggest that HDL promotes reverse
cholesterol transport, that is, the removal of cholesterol
from tissues including removal of unesterified cholesterol
in atheromatous plaques so that it can be transported to
the liver and excreted. But proof is required. Most important,
HDL is believed to prevent LDL from oxidation
and aggregation and thus protect against formation and
progression of atheroma. This important area requires
further intensive investigation for clarification.

3. Variability of HDL Levels
About 25% of blood cholesterol is carried as HDL
cholesterol. People with high levels of HDL cholesterol,
greater than 60 mg (1.6 mmol), appear to live longer and
have less coronary artery disease. People with levels less
than 31 mg (0.8 mmol) have an increased risk of coronary
artery disease. It is not clear why some people should have
high values and others very low. It appears that about half
of the variation in HDL levels in the general population is
explained by genetic factors. Fortunately not all individuals
with low HDL levels get heart attacks.

Nongenetic factors that are known to be associated with
low levels of HDL are diabetes, obesity, smoking, and lack
of exercise.

Most females and males prior to puberty have about the
same cholesterol levels. Boys, however, at puberty have
about a 20% drop in HDL and a rise in LDL cholesterol.
The decrease in HDL cholesterol may be due to an
increase in androgens. In men the HDL level stays fairly
constant up to age 55, then starts to rise between 55–65.
It is possible that this rise might be due to a decrease
of androgens, which occurs during the male climacteric
period. In women there is a gradual rise in HDL cholesterol
from age 25 onward. Women are believed to be
protected until post menopause by this increase in HDL
and by their hormonal status. Why women are protected
from coronary heart disease until menopause and yet not
protected from strokes is not easily explained, especially if
atherosclerosis is the basis of both diseases.
There is a relationship between HDL cholesterol
levels and population groups, foods, alcohol, exercise,
and drugs.

D. Very-Low-Density Lipoprotein
The very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) is very large and
low in density. It transports triglycerides, which are used
mainly as a fuel; for example, in exercising muscle. The
evidence linking elevated blood triglyceride levels with
coronary heart disease is very weak and unclear. Thus, an
elevated blood triglyceride level alone is not of importance.
Weight reduction or cessation of alcohol intake always
causes a marked reduction in triglyceride levels but does
not alter LDL cholesterol levels.

V. BLOOD TESTS
A. Total Cholesterol
What is a normal blood cholesterol, and when does the
level produce a risk of coronary heart disease? Blood
cholesterol is not necessarily very high, that is, greater than
265 mg (6.9 mmol), in those who have heart attacks. In
fact, most heart attacks occur in individuals with blood
cholesterol around the average of 220–250 mg (5.7–6.5
mmol). In the LIPID study described above, only 3806
men with a blood cholesterol greater than 265 mg could be
found from a screening of 480,000. The remainder had
cholesterol levels of less than 265 mg and most likely in the
range of 200 to 250 mg.

Between 1970 and 1989, laboratories in North America
reported a normal cholesterol as between 150 (3.9 mmol)
and 250 (6.5 mmol). But it is now established that
individuals with so-called normal cholesterol in the range
of 220–250 are at increased risk, and heart attacks are
common in individuals with such levels. A blood cholesterol
of 220–250 mg (5.7–6.5 mmol) is considered high
by world standards. Most doctors now talk about an
optimal safe total cholesterol level of less than 190 mg/dl
(4.9 mmol/l) or LDL less than 120 mg (3 mmol). Heart
attacks are uncommon in individuals with a cholesterol
level less than 160 mg (4.2 mmol).

If we treat patients with a cholesterol level greater
than 250 mg (6.5 mmol), we will be excluding more than
80% of the population who are at high risk for coronary
heart disease. To reiterate, most heart attacks in North
America occur in people with blood cholesterol between
220 and 260 mg. Individuals with a blood cholesterol
less than 180 mg (4.7 mmol) obviously deal with
cholesterol by their own natural process. They are among
the fortunate; no dietary modification is necessary, and
blood cholesterol only needs to be rechecked about every
five years.

The blood cholesterol measurement gives the total
blood cholesterol, that is, LDL cholesterol plus HDL
cholesterol. Food eaten within hours does not have an
immediate effect on total blood cholesterol and HDL
cholesterol measurements, so fasting is not necessary for
this test. Triglyceride level is not an independent risk
factor and therefore widespread screening for elevated
triglycerides is not warranted. It is also an expensive
investigation. If your doctor thinks that triglyceride determination
is necessary, you must fast for 14 h before
blood is taken. Blood tests for glucose, diabetes, and
triglycerides are the only tests for which it is necessary to
fast for 12–14 h before the test.

B. Blood LDL Cholesterol Levels
Determination of LDL cholesterol is not done routinely,
because it is a difficult, time-consuming, and expensive
technique. It must be done fasting because it is
calculated by a formula that requires a triglyceride blood
level, which must be done after fasting 12 hours. The
formula for calculating the blood LDL cholesterol level
is as follows:
LDL cholesterol
¼ total cholesterol  HDL cholesterol
 ðtriglyceride divided by 5Þ
¼ mg=dl; for the value in mmol=L divide by 2
This formula does not apply if the triglycerides exceed 250
mg/dl.

In individuals age 15–75 optimal LDL cholesterol levels
are less than 115 mg/dl (3 mmol/L). In North America,
the UK, and Europe the vast majority of individuals
have an LDL cholesterol in the range of 130–200 mg/dl
(3.4–5.2 mmol/L). In patients with coronary heart disease,
the level of LDL is of paramount importance and should
be maintained at less than 100 mg/dl (2.6 mmol).

C. HDL Cholesterol Blood Level
Blood testing for HDL cholesterol levels can be done in the
nonfasting state. Levels less than 35 mg/dl (0.9 mmol/L)
are considered low and less than 27 mg/dl (0.7 mmol/L) is
considered unacceptably low. Levels greater than 54 mg/dl
(1.4 mmol/L) are considered optimal.

CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE RISK
A. Based on LDL Cholesterol
A high LDL cholesterol level is considered the most
important major risk factor for coronary artery disease.
The relationship between LDL cholesterol and coronary
artery disease risk is continuous over a broad range of
blood levels from low to high (110 mg/dl to greater than
190 mg/dl) and LDL cholesterol is the primary target of
therapy.

Patients with established coronary artery disease are
considered to have a 10-year risk greater than 20%. It is
expected that more than 20% of such individuals will
develop a recurrent coronary artery disease event within 10
years. In these individuals LDL cholesterol levels greater
than 130 mg/dl greatly increase the risk. Most national
guidelines state that in patients with proven coronary
artery disease or CAD risk equivalent, particularly
diabetes, drug treatment is strongly indicated to maintain
the level to less than 100 mg/dl (2.6 mmol/L).

Individuals without coronary artery disease or evidence
of cardiovascular disease should be assigned a risk based on
the following:
1. Their levels of LDL cholesterol: risk is increased if the
LDL-C is >190 mg/dl, and the goal should be <130
mg/dl (3.5 mmol/L)
2. Presence of diabetes risk score of >20 with a goal LDL
<100 mg/dl
3. Age
4. Family history of premature coronary heart disease
5. HDL cholesterol level
6. Smoking
7. The presence or absence of hypertension

DIETS AND CHOLESTEROL
A. Saturated Fats and Cholesterol
All animal fat is saturated and solid at normal room
temperatures. The degree of hydrogenation of a fat
determines how solid and saturated it is. Saturated fats
are broken down in the body and increase blood cholesterol.
Therefore, the most effective dietary method of
lowering blood cholesterol is to reduce intake of saturated
fats. High-cholesterol foods are few, therefore, we do not
use the term low-cholesterol diet.

Vegetable fats are unsaturated and almost all are liquid
at room temperatures. There are three vegetable oils that
should be avoided: coconut, palm, and peanut. Coconut
oil contains a high amount of saturated fat and is used
for cooking in several countries. It is also used in North
America in nondairy cream substitutes, for example,
coffee cream. Palm oil contains significant amounts of
saturated fat, and peanut oil, though mainly unsaturated,
has certain fatty acids that produce plaques of atheroma
in animals. The only vegetable that contains a little
saturated fat is the avocado; therefore, low-cholesterol,
low-fat diets often recommend that you avoid avocados.
You will note from Table 1, however, that although a large
avocado contains a significant amount of fat, only a little
of it is saturated, and no cholesterol is present. Therefore,
one avocado a week is an excellent food, especially if a
high potassium intake is required.

B. Polyunsaturates and Linolenic Acid
The replacement of some saturated fats in the diet by
polyunsaturated, monounsaturated, and other unsaturated
fats found in abundance in vegetable oil reduces blood
LDL cholesterol. The saturated and polyunsaturated fat
contents of commonly used foods are given in Table 1.
Oils recommended for the preparation of meals include
canola, olive, and soybean because they contain alphalinolenic
acid, very low cholesterol levels, and a minimum
of saturated fat. For example, ‘‘cholesterol-free’’ canola oil
contains 6% saturates and will produce a small amount
of cholesterol in the body. Not all vegetable oils claim to
be cholesterol free but contain significant saturated fats.
Because vegetable margarines contain a small amount of
saturated fat and hydrogenation remains controversial,
they should be used in moderation. Some products may have palm or
coconut oil added to enhance hardening; these two oils are
not recommended. Olive oil is recommended
for salads, but olive oil margarines may contain palm oil
to enhance hardening so read labels carefully. Some margarines
claim that they contain no cholesterol and are
nonhydrogenated yet they contain palm oil.

It is important to note that many recipes developed for
weight reduction diets tend to cut out carbohydrate foods
in order to decrease weight and may even introduce foods
that increase blood clotting and cholesterol. Therefore,
be careful in choosing ‘‘popular’’ weight reduction diets.
Consult Table 4 and the instructions given in the chapter
on Heart Attacks.

C. Nuts and Cholesterol and Risk
Most nuts contain no cholesterol and very little saturated
fats, but the exceptions include coconut and Brazil nuts
which have high saturated fat content and their products
should be avoided (see Table 4). Cashew nuts and peanuts
have significant saturated fats, and although they contain
an adequate amount of monounsaturated and polyunsaturated
fatty acids, they are not recommended and should
be used sparingly. Additionally, it appears that peanuts
may have atherogenic potential. Nuts that contain little
saturated fat and a high amount of monounsaturated fats
include almonds, walnuts, and hazelnuts and their intake
is highly recommended.

D. General Advice on Diets
Diets to reduce atherosclerosis or heart attacks must be
tailored to meet the needs of the individual, because each
family has different eating habits. Special recipes and diet
sheets may be misleading and difficult to follow for a
lifetime and individuals should consult Table 4, or similar
information.

It is recommended that the general population use foods
that contain a low amount of saturated fat and cholesterol
and make an effort to increase intake of polyunsaturated
and monounsaturated fat, linolenic acid, and foods that
have a favorable effect on blood clotting (see the chapter
Blood Clots). Reduction in the intake of cholesterol
alone is not sufficient because saturated fat is converted
into cholesterol in the body; therefore, reduction in
saturated fat intake is essential. Most important, the
intake of trans fat must be curtailed.

The recommendation made by the American Heart
Association is as follows:
Total fat intake should be reduced from the average
40% of calories to 30%. Polyunsaturated fat should
provide up to 10% of calories and the polyunsaturated
fat to saturated fat (P/S) ratio should be about 1:1.
Carbohydrate intake should be increased from an
average of about 45%–55% to maintain average
body weight, and protein intake should remain at
about 12–14%.
Scotland has not shared, however, in the slight decline
in mortality that has been experienced in Australia,
Belgium, Canada, Finland, Norway, and the United
States. Scotland has moved up in the world league of
coronary deaths to second for men, and Northern Ireland
has moved to third for men and second for women. In the
UK, fat intake has remained the same for the past 30 years
at about 40% of food energy and even increased between
1974 and 1982 to 41% of food energy. The Department
of Health and Social Security made the following
recommendations to physicians and the general public in
the UK:

Reduce the total fat intake to 35% of food energy with
saturated fats making up no more than 11%. Increase
the polyunsaturated to saturated ratio from the present
0.27 to about 0.45. The intake of polyunsaturated
acids presently at 5% of food energy should reach 7%,
which is less than the American and World Health
Organization’s suggestion of 10%.

The UK panel claims that the effects on the population
of a P/S ratio of 1.0 and beyond are unknown. Individuals
who are considered to have a high risk of developing
coronary heart disease are advised to cut fats to 30% of
food energy, with saturated fats contributing no more
than 10%, i.e., identical to the recommendation in the
United States. Thus there is consensus on both sides of the
Atlantic.

A Mediterranean style diet that contains an abundance
of linolenic acids is strongly recommended by the author;
see the chapter Diets and Heart Disease.
The reduction in dietary saturated fat intake as well
as the cessation of smoking by many individuals has provided
a decline in the incidence of coronary heart disease
mortality.

CHOLESTEROL-LOWERING DRUGS
A. HMC-CoA Reductase Inhibitors (Statins)
The statins, atorvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, pravastatin,
and simvastatin, are cholesterol-lowering agents
that are effective and have few side effects. They cause a
20–40% reduction in total, or LDL, cholesterol. They may
cause a small, 1–6%, increase in HDL cholesterol, but
this effect is variable. Clinical trials have shown that these
agents decrease LDL cholesterol levels and reduce the risk
of heart attack and death from heart attacks. The newest
agent, rosuvastatin, is even more powerful than Lipitor
in reducing LDL levels to goal. Randomized clinical trials
that document the effectiveness of these agents are given
the chapter Dyslipidemia.

Mild side effects from statins include headaches, muscle
aches, and pain in the upper abdomen without gastritis,
ulcers, or bleeding. An increase in the liver enzymes may
be detected on blood test, but the risk subsides when the
drug is discontinued. Caution: Do not take with niacin
or fibrates such as gemfibrozil or fenofibrate. Statins are
contraindicated in pregnancy.

1. Atorvastatin
Supplied: Tablets: 10, 20, 40, 60 mg.
Dosage: 10–40 mg once daily; the author’s maximum
dose is 60 mg daily. The 80 mg dose is rarely required and
more adverse effects may occur at the maximal dose of
the drug.
2. Fluvastatin
Supplied: Capsules: 20 mg.
Dosage: 20–40 mg after the evening meal or bedtime.
3. Lovastatin
Supplied: Tablets: 10, 20, 40 mg.
Dosage: 10–40 mg after the evening meal.
4. Pravastatin
Supplied: Tablets: 10, 20, 40 mg.
Dosage: 10–40 mg after the evening meal or bedtime.

5. Rosuvastatin
Supplied: Tablets: 10, 20, 40 mg.
Dosage: 10 mg once daily is more effective in lowering
LDL cholesterol than 40 mg of Lipitor or simvastatin.
It causes a better increase in HDL cholesterol. The author’s
maximum suggested dose is 20 mg daily.
6. Simvastatin
Supplied: Tablets: 5, 10, 20 40, 60 mg.
Dosage: 10–40 mg after the evening meal.
B. Cholesterol Absorption Inhibitors
1. Ezetimibe
Supplied: Tablets 10 mg.
Dosage: 10 mg once daily. This drug has a low side
effect profile and can be combined with a statin.

Resins

1. Cholestyramine
Supplied: Powder in packets or in cans with a scoop.
Dosage: 12–24 g daily in liquid a half hour before to a
half hour after meals. Start with 4 g (one scoop) twice daily
for one week, then 4 g three times daily for one month,
and if necessary, thereafter increase to 8 g three times daily.
Cholestyramine and colestipol are not absorbed from
the gut and act by binding bile salts in the intestine. This
action causes the liver to increase the conversion of
cholesterol to bile acids, which are excreted in the bile.
Cholestyramine has no serious side effects. Constipation,
nausea, bloating, gas, and abdominal cramps may
occur. High doses taken for several years can cause poor
absorption of certain vitamins. It may interfere with the
absorption of digoxin and blood thinners (anticoagulants).
The recent introduction of ezetimibe as an effective drug
will render bile acid resins such as cholestyramine and
colestipol obsolete.

Fibrates
1. Gemfibrozil
Supplied: Capsules: 300 mg.
Dosage: 300 mg taken about a half hour before the
morning and the evening meal for one to two weeks, then
300 mg twice daily.
Gemfibrozil is the first fibrate to be introduced in the
seventies since the discontinuation of clofibrate in the
late sixties. This drug causes a 5–10% reduction in serum
cholesterol, 30% reduction in triglycerides, and a 5–10 %
increase in HDL cholesterol. Side effects include stomach
pain and bloating in less than 5% of patients. Gallstones
may occur.

In the VA-HIT study gemfibrozil caused a 31% decrease
in triglycerides, but only a 6% increase in HDL cholesterol
compared with placebo. This negligible increase in HDL is
claimed to have caused a beneficial reduction in cardiac
events. There was no reduction in all cause mortality or in
total cardiac mortality; there was a small, 22% reduction
in total cardiac death and nonfatal myocardial infarction
(MI) (P<0.05), a low level of significance. Virtually all of
the benefit was due to reduction in nonfatal MIs; a result
similar to that observed for vitamin E in the CHAOS
study.

2. Fenofibrate
Supplied; Tablets 100, 160 mg.
Dosage: 100–200 mg once daily with the main meal,
maximum 100 mg in renal dysfunction.
3. Bezafibrate
Supplied: Tablets 200 mg.
Dosage: Mono formulation once daily in the evening.
E. Niacin (Nicotinic Acid)
This drug is not often used because of prominent side
effects, which include flushing, itching, nausea, abdominal
pain, diarrhea, jaundice, gout, palpitations, and increased
blood sugar in diabetics. This drug should not be used if
you have low blood pressure or have had a heart attack,
heart failure, liver disease, a stomach ulcer, or diabetes. It is
not advisable to combine niacin with statins because severe
damage to muscles and the kidneys may occur.

Combination Therapy
The combination of simvastatin and ezetimibe has been
shown in a clinical trial to be more effective than simvastatin
alone. The combination caused LDL cholesterol
reductions of 44–57% and HDL cholesterol increases of
8%–11%. Ezetimibe 10 mg plus simvastatin 10 mg and
simvastatin 80 mg alone each caused a 44% reduction
in LDL cholesterol. The combination was well tolerated
with the safety profile similar to those of simvastatin and
of placebo.

The combination of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe is
advisable for severe hypercholesterolemia. This is the
most powerful combination available for the reduction
of elevated LDL cholesterol and is a welcome addition to
the clinician’s armamentarium. Caution is required, however,
because liver dysfunction or rhabdomyolysis may be
precipitated at high doses of any statin, particularly if drug
interaction occurs.

For more information visit Jigfo.com, the no.1 source of information.

Tuesday, July 29, 2008

Cardiomyopathy


CARDIOMYOPATHY IS A RARE FORM OF HEART
disease that affects only the heart muscle. The term
cardiomyopathy is derived from the word cardio, the heart,
and myopathy, which indicates a weakness or disturbance
of the muscle. Heart muscle diseases of unknown cause are
classified under the term cardiomyopathy.
In one form of heart muscle disease, the muscle of the
ventricle becomes considerably thickened to the point that
the cavity of the left ventricle becomes nearly filled with
muscle mass; thus less blood enters the chamber and less
blood is expelled into the circulation. Because the muscle is
enlarged, or hypertrophied, the disease is called hypertrophic
cardiomyopathy. This is a disease of young adults.
See chapter entitled ‘‘Athletes and Sudden Cardiac Death.’’
The muscle enlargement may be so severe that it
obstructs the flow of blood into the aorta, and death may
occur suddenly, particularly in individuals from age 12 to
36 years. Some athletes who have died suddenly have had
this disease. In some families, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
is caused by mutation in the cardiac myosin gene.
Approximately 60% of cases occur in families with an
autosomal dominant pattern and 40% of cases are
sporadic.

In another form of heart muscle disease, the heart dilates
without increasing the size of the muscle. The chambers
are swollen, and the muscle becomes weak. This condition
often results in failure of the heart to pump blood, which
results in heart failure. Heart transplants are required in
some of these patients (see the chapter Heart Failure).
Other types of heart muscle diseases may be caused by
viruses. Patients with AIDS have had HIV viral infection
of the heart muscle. The heart muscle may also be
damaged by cocaine, an overload of iron (hemochromatosis),
and some inherited conditions.

With different varieties of involvement of the heart
muscle, classification became necessary. In the 1970s and
1980s cardiomyopathy was defined as heart muscle disease
of unknown cause. The current classifications are:
1. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
2. Dilated cardiomyopathy
3. Restrictive cardiomyopathy
4. Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy
(right ventricular dysplasia)
5. Unclassified cardiomyopathy: diseases that do not have
features of 1through 4 and include fibroelastosis and
mitochondrial disease
6. Specific cardiomyopathies (specific heart muscle
diseases formerly called secondary cardiomyopathy).
Each of these cardiomyopathies will be discussed. Most
of these diseases are rare, but hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
has become well-known because it is one of the causes of
sudden death in young athletes and young individuals.

I. HYPERTROPHIC CARDIOMYOPATHY
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is found throughout
the world with a prevalence in North America of
0.2%. Before the diagnosis of HCM is considered hypertensive
heart disease, a major cause of the left ventricle
hypertrophy, and other causes of hypertrophy must be
excluded. In practice HCM is defined and diagnosed
by the demonstration of unexplained left ventricular
hypertrophy.

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is a disease caused by a
wide variety of mutations in genes encoding cardiac
sarcomeric proteins, which leads to inappropriate and
often severe hypertrophy of the myocardium.

A. Genetics
Approximately 60% of cases are familial and are inherited
in a Mendelian single gene autosomal dominant fashion.
More than 150 mutations in 10 culprit genes that encode
sarcomeric proteins are implicated in this disease. The
most common of these culprit genes include:
1. Beta myosin heavy chain (MYH7), approximately 35%
2. Cardiac troponin-2 (TNNT2), approximately 15%
3. Myosin binding protein C genes, approximately 15%
4. Alpha tropomyosin
5. Essential myosin light chain
6. Troponins-I
7. Alpha cardiac actin
8. Regulatory myosin light chain.

Familial HCM can be caused by genetic defects at more
than one locus, therefore, it is a genetically heterogeneous
disease. The mutations of the troponins-T and some
mutations of the beta myosin heavy chain appear to be
associated with sudden death more often than other
mutations. Some mutations may be associated with a high
incidence of sudden cardiac death, whereas others appear
to have a more benign course. This has led to the hypothesis
that genotyping may facilitate the identification of
individuals at risk for sudden death. But there is extreme
variability and even mutations that were considered by
some to be malignant, MYH7 and TNNT2, often run a
benign course. In a study by Ackerman et al. so-called
‘‘malignant’’ mutation was found in only 1% of 293 study
patients. The authors concluded that given the low
prevalence of malignant MYH7 and TNNT2 mutations
in a large study, genetic testing was unlikely to contribute
significantly to risk assessment.

Mutations of the troponins-T gene usually result in only
mild or no heart muscle hypertrophy. Some of the sporadic
forms of the disease are caused by spontaneous mutations.
It is of interest that in some patients with an abnormal
gene and normal echocardiography, the most diagnostic
and least expensive test is the ECG.

B. Macroscopic Features
There is a marked increase in myocardial mass and the
ventricular cavity is encroached upon such that the
ventricular cavity becomes smaller and narrowed (see
Fig. 1). The marked thickening of the interventricular
septum obstructs the free flow of blood from the left
ventricle into the aorta, (outflow tract gradient). The left
ventricle tends to be involved much more than the right.
The degree of hypertrophy and the parts of the heart
that are involved are extremely variable. See Figure 1 in the
chapter entitled ‘‘Athletes and Sudden Cardiac Death.’’
Hypertrophy can be patchy, involving the septum only,
the apex of the anterior, and the lateral walls. This type of
hypertrophy is often referred to as asymmetric hypertrophy.
(Fig. 1). Occasionally the hypertrophy of the heart
muscle that is seen in HCM and that observed in highly
trained male athletes may be difficult to differentiate.
Hypertrophy of the apex of the heart (apical HCM) is
more common in Japan than in other parts of the world.
In apical HCM the ECG shows a highly abnormal pattern
of giant negative T waves in the precordial ECG leads.
Despite the frightfully abnormal looking ECG, patients
are often asymptomatic and the disease runs a benign
course. Figure 2 shows the ECG in a patient with apical
HCM. Figure 3 shows a patient with HCM, mild
hypertrophy of the septum, and mild free wall hypertrophy
but without significant obstruction of the outflow tract
that leads from the left ventricle to the aorta as depicted
in Fig. 1.

C. Microscopic Features
Microscopically in HCM the myocytes are hypertrophied
and in disarray and there is abundant interstitial fibrosis.
Individual myocytes demonstrate disarray in the orientation
or their myofibrillar architecture. The disorganization
in the alignment of cardiac myocytes is oriented around
loose connective tissue. Large areas of fibrosis are observed
throughout the affected muscle. This microscopic picture
may also be seen in muscle where there is no obvious
hypertrophy.

D. Pathophysiology
1. Most patients show asymmetric hypertrophy of the
septum and a hypertrophied nondilated left and or
right ventricle. The septum may be diffusely hypertrophied
or only in its upper, mid, or apical portion.
Hypertrophy extends to the free wall of the left
ventricle.
2. There is decreased compliance and incomplete relaxation
of the thickened and stiff left ventricular muscle
that causes impedance to filling of the ventricles during
diastole (diastolic dysfunction)
3. The rapid powerful contraction of hypertrophied left
ventricle expels most of its contents during the first
half of systole. This hyperdynamic systolic function
is apparent in most patients with HCM.
4. The anterior leaflet of the mitral valve is displaced
toward the hypertrophied septum. Mitral regurgitation
is virtually always present in the obstructive phase of
the disease.
5. Because of the obstruction overflow from the left
ventricle into the aorta and outflow pressure gradient
at rest, HCM is much worse during exercise in more
than 40% of patients.
6. Disease of small branches of the coronary arteries
may occur, but the major coronary arteries are not
obstructed.

E. Clinical Features
1. Shortness of breath commonly occurs but may not be
noticeable in many patients until the obstruction to
outflow of the left ventricle becomes severe.
2. Fainting, syncope, or presyncope during exercise or
during normal activities is a warning signal.
3. Chest pain may occur because of restricted flow to the
coronary arteries.
4. Abnormal heart rhythms causing palpitations may
occur.
5. On examination, hypertrophy of the heart is reflected
by a thrusting and forceful apex beat of the heart
that can be seen or felt with the palpating hand. A
murmur is heard with the stethoscope and has typical
characteristics, but the entire examination may reveal
little or no abnormalities depending on the stage of the
disease.
6. The ECG is usually abnormal with pathologic Q
waves in leads I, II, III, aVF, V5, and V6, as shown in
Fig. 3.
7. Signs of heart failure are observed in the end stages
of the disease. Figure 4 gives an outline of various
processes that lead to the end stages which culminate in
heart failure or death.

II. SUDDEN DEATH
Death is most often sudden in HCM and unfortunately
this may occur in asymptomatic patients, in those who
were unaware that they have the disease, or in individuals
with an otherwise stable course.
The mechanisms that result in sudden death remain
unresolved. The identification of patients at high risk of
sudden death presents great difficulties for the average and
expert clinicians.

A. Genotyping
Genotyping is not available as a routine clinical test, and
most important, it is currently problematic in prognostic
assessment. The findings of Ackerman et al. of only 1%
malignant mutation in 293 patients is important and is
in keeping with several other observations. Even within
so-called high-risk families there is a variable disease
expression and prognosis. Watkins et al. described a large
Scottish family with mutation in TNNT2 in which 8 died
suddenly before age 30, but 8 others lived to be 70–80
years old. Several other reports of this type have been
noted.

B. Clinical Evaluation
Because the promise held for genotyping is not likely to
materialize, assessment of risk is based mainly on clinical
evaluation and specific investigations. Clinical parameters
that may assist in the assessment of risk for sudden death,
however, remain unsystematic and haphazard. Mckenna
et al. made the point that at best, clinical risk markers are
only modestly predictive of short-to-medium term risk of
sudden death. The presence of a severe outflow tract
gradient does not correlate with the risk of sudden death.

C. Marked Left Ventricular Hypertrophy
Current evidence indicates that marked left ventricular
hypertrophy should not be relied upon for diagnosis. Some
studies indicate that left ventricular wall thickness greater
than 30 mm significantly increases the risk of sudden
death. In a study by Spirito et al. sudden death occurred
in less than 1% of patients with maximal thickness less
than 20 mm and in 16% of patients with maximal
thickness greater than 30 mm over the average follow up of
7 years. Unfortunately at least 10% of patients in most
survival studies show a left ventricular wall thickness
greater than 30 mm. Most important, the majority of
sudden cardiac death in patients with HCM occurs in
those with a wall thickness of less than 30 mm.
Survivors of cardiac arrest make up a high-risk group
that is easy to define. These are individuals who have
survived an episode of sustained ventricular tachycardia.
These patients have about an 8% chance of further cardiac
event in five years.

A history of sudden death in the family or syncope in
an individual is worrisome, and there is considerable
anecdotal evidence to suggest that these two features carry
a sizable predictive risk. The worry to the family and
individual is understandable. The outcome statistical
analyses in large series show that syncope and a previous
history of sudden death are not reliable indicators,
however, for the prediction of future sudden death.
Syncope is more sinister in children with HCM than in
adults.

Findings of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia on
Holter electrocardiographic ambulatory monitoring and
an abnormal blood pressure response on exercise along
with clinical evaluation (massive left ventricular hypertrophy)
and family history (unexplained syncope, family
history of sudden death) are useful toward a diagnosis. In a
prospective study in which these parameters were
present, there was an annual sudden death risk of
approximately 3%.

A group at low risk for sudden death may be identified
as asymptomatic patients with left ventricular thickness
less than 20 mm, absence of nonsustained ventricular
tachycardia on Holter monitoring, normal exercise blood
pressure response, and no family history of sudden death.

D. Management
1. Medical
Beta-blockers are the mainstay of medical therapy. Drug
management is used mainly in patients who are symptomatic
and in patients who present with chest pain, mild
shortness of breath, or presyncope. A marked increase in
vigorous contractions of the heart muscle (hypercontractility)
dictates the need for more oxygen by the thickened
muscle; beta-blocking drugs such as metoprolol, which
decreases the force and velocity of contraction of the
ventricle, and decreases oxygen requirement, have been
used successfully for more than 30 years to achieve
subjective and objective benefit in a significant number of
patients. Also, in patients with HCM the heart rate is slow
and this leads to improved filling of the ventricle during
diastole and increased filling of the coronary arteries that
supply the thickened muscle with blood and oxygen. Betablocking
agents, however, have not been shown to prevent
sudden death and clinical trials are difficult in patients
with HCM. Other agents used in selected cases include
verapamil, which may precipitate heart failure and hypotension
in some. Verapamil improves relaxation of the
ventricle and allows for better filling of the left ventricle,
but it should be avoided in patients who are at risk for
development of heart failure.

Diuretics may cause dehydration because of the removal
of salt and water from the body. This effect decreases the
volume of blood returned to the heart, and this may have
serious consequences in patients who already have poor
filling of the left ventricle.

2. Chemical Septal Ablation
This technique is used mainly in highly symptomatic
patients who have contraindications or are resistant to drug
treatment. In these patients the outflow tract gradient
at rest should be greater than 30 mmHg or greater than
60 mmHg with provocation. The septum usually measures
greater than 18 mm thick. Catheterization of the target
vessel (the most important proximal septal artery that
supplies the septum with blood) and ablation of the area
with the use of alcohol appears to produce satisfactory
results in selected patients. Complications include complete
heart block, damage to a coronary artery, myocardial
infarction, and pericardial tamponade. Hospital mortality
ranges from 1 to 4%.

3. Surgical Myomectomy
Surgical removal of excess muscle tissue in the region of
the thickened septum is a logical solution to reduce
outflow tract gradient and promote better flow of blood
from the left ventricle into the aorta. In 1957 Brock
advanced this method, and subsequently Morrow popularized
the technique. A portion of the thickened interventricular
septum is excised; often the mitral valve is replaced.
Symptoms are definitely improved, but the mortality rate
ranges from 2 to 5%. Surgical intervention is usually
satisfactory; long-term improvement in symptoms and
exercise capacity is observed in most patients.

4. Dual-Chamber Pacemaker
Dual-chamber pacemaker insertion is based on the observation
that excitation of the septum by pacing causes the
septum to contract away from the opposing wall reducing
the obstruction to outflow of blood from the ventricle
(reduces the left ventricular outflow tract gradient). This
strategy appeared useful in the European trial, but several
trials in the United States have failed to show significant
benefit.

III. DILATED CARDIOMYOPATHY
Heart failure is rare in individuals younger than age 20.
If congenital heart disease is excluded, the most common
cause of heart failure in the young is idiopathic dilated
cardiomyopathy (DCM). More than 50 known specific
diseases of heart muscle can produce the signs, symptoms,
and manifestations of idiopathic DCM. Some of these
diseases include the following:
1. Infectious: Coxsackie, cytomegalovirus, HIV, Chagas
disease, tuberculosis, acute rheumatic fever, toxoplasmosis,
trichinosis, echinococcus, schistosomiasis, and
Lyme disease
2. Endocrine: Thyroid diseases (thyrotoxicosis and,
hypothyroidism), diabetes, and acromegaly
3. Infiltrative diseases: Amyloidosis, hemochromatosis,
and sarcoidosis
4. Alcoholic cardiomyopathy
5. Collagen vascular disease: Lupus erythematosus, scleroderma,
mixed connective tissue disease, polyarteritis
nodosa, and rheumatoid arthritis
6. Toxic: Cocaine, heroin, amphetamines, cancer chemotherapeutic
agents, arsenic, cobalt, lead, phosphorus,
and ethylene glycol
7. Nutritional: Thiamine, protein, and selenium
8. Others: Endomyocardial fibroelastosis, peripartum, and
sleep apnea
Idiopathic DCM is transmitted in an autosomal
dominant manner although X-linked, autosomal recessive,
and mitochondrial inheritance also have been observed.

A. Genetics
Shaw et al. stated in an editorial that the genetic
heterogeneity of DCM is illustrated by the autosomal
dominant form with several foci and gene mutations
identified that include Iq32 (cardiac troponin-T), 14q11
(beta myosin heavy chain), 4q12 (beta –sarcoglycan), and
15q14(actin). Figure 5 shows some proteins involved in
DCM and their cellular location.

The mechanisms by which individual mutations cause
idiopathic DCM require further clarification. The end
result of the disease is a weakened heart muscle that leads
to heart failure. Abnormalities in force transmission and
velocity of contraction of the heart muscle appear to
result from mutations of contractile proteins, actin, alphatropomyosin,
and desmin. Cardiac beta myosin heavy
chain and troponins-T mutations are believed to result
in reduced force generation by the sarcomere. Mutations
in both sarcoglycans are believed to cause DCM.
Mutations in the mitochondrial respiratory chain also
can lead to DCM.

B. Clinical Features
1. Progressive shortness of breath on exertion appears over
weeks or months. This then progresses to shortness of
breath in bed (orthopnea) and paroxysmal nocturnal
dyspnea.
2. Signs and symptoms of right and left heart failure
become evident.
3. On auscultation gallop sounds are typically present.

D. Management
Transplantation has a role in selected individuals but does
not benefit patients worldwide. Aggressive treatment for
heart failure carries the only hope for improved survival
and must include the following medications:
1. Diuretics: Furosemide in a dosage to prevent fluid
retention, edema, signs of heart failure, and particularly
for the relief of shortness of breath.
2. ACE inhibitor therapy: Enalapril or lisinopril or similar
ACE inhibitor, see the chapter Heart Failure.
3. Beta blockers: The use of metoprolol or carvedilol is
now recognized as essential. These agents have recently
been shown to be effective in relieving symptoms as
well as improving cardiac function. Lowes et al.
reported the study of 53 patients treated with metoprolol
or carvedilol and observed significant improvement
that was associated with changes in myocardial
gene expression. A study by Cice et al. in 114 dialysis
patients with dilated cardiomyopathy treated with
carvedilol showed a reduction in left ventricular
function, left ventricular volumes, and clinical status.
4. Spironolactone: Added to the above beta-blockers
further improves clinical status survival and decreases
hospitalization for heart failure.
5. Dual-chamber electronic pacing: In patients with heart
failure and intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD),
this has shown significant benefit, reduced hospitalization,
and probably will delay the time to transplantation
in individuals on waiting lists.
6. Anticoagulants: These may be required to reduce the
risk of embolism that occurs frequently in patients with
dilated hearts.
7. Antiarrhythmics: In some of these patients implantation
of an IVCD may become necessary.

IV. RESTRICTIVE CARDIOMYOPATHY
Restrictive cardiomyopathy is rare in the western world
and in Europe. Diseases that cause damage to the muscle
and restrict the flow of blood into the ventricle include
amyloidosis, sarcoidosis, hemochromatosis, scleroderma,
Adriamycin toxicity, and heart involvement by infectious
agents. The most common cause of restrictive cardiomyopathy,
especially in tropical regions, is endomyocardial
fibrosis.

The damage to the muscle in these diseases causes the
ventricular walls to become excessively rigid and the main
abnormality is impaired relaxation and compliance that
impedes the filling of the ventricle. Less blood is held
within the ventricle and thus less blood is expelled into the
aorta and systemic circulation. When the supply of blood
to organs becomes inadequate, heart failure is diagnosed.
This situation is due mainly to poor diastolic filling of
the ventricle rather than to a decrease in the force of
contraction of the ventricular muscle (systolic dysfunction)
which is the most common cause for heart failure.

A. Clinical Features
In the tropics endomyocardial fibrosis may result in
intermittent fever, shortness of breath, cough, palpitations,
edema, and tiredness. Symptoms and signs of heart failure
must be differentiated from constrictive pericarditis.
Endomyocardial fibrosis may mimic the hemodynamic
and clinical features of constrictive peritonitis. Chest x-ray
or fluoroscopy may show calcification of the right and
left ventricular apical myocardium due to thrombus
formation, calcification of all fibrosis, and calcification of
the endocardial region. The apex of the heart may be
completely obliterated. Blood tests may reveal increased
eosinophils (hypereosinophilia). Echocardiogram typically
shows obliteration of the apices of the ventricle with
echogenic masses. Also, extensive myocardial calcification
may be detected.

B. Management
1. Steroids may be helpful to subdue inflammatory
changes.
2. Anticoagulants are advisable to prevent thromboembolism.
3. Arrhythmias may respond to small doses of a betablockers
and occasionally some beneficial response
may be obtained with ACE inhibitors.
4. Diuretics are usually not beneficial, but may be
required for symptomatic relief of shortness of breath
and other manifestations of heart failure.

V. SPECIFIC HEART MUSCLE DISEASE
Specific heart muscle disease usually produces a dilated
form of cardiomyopathy with impaired systolic function.
Restrictive physiology is seen with amyloid, sarcoid,
neoplasm, radiation, scleroderma, hemochromatosis, and
eosinophilic endomyocardial disease, in which eosinophilia
is usually present. Rarely, myocardial tuberculosis is
present with restrictive features. Amyloid heart disease and
EMF are usually considered examples of RCM, but when
cardiac involvement is associated with multiple organ
disease, they qualify as specific heart muscle disease (see
Table 1).
Endomyocardial biopsy is often required but may not
be helpful in patchy disease such as sarcoid. The presence
of systemic disease of other organs, especially the liver,
lymph nodes, and skin, which can be easily submitted to
biopsy, assist in defining the underlying cause.
Amyloidosis causes deposition of specific proteins as
insoluble fibrils in the extracellular space of several organs
including the heart. The disease affects individuals in the
fifth and sixth decade of life. The heart muscle is weakened
and mainly right heart failure ensues in more than 40%
of patients.

For more information visit Jigfo.com, the no.1 source of information.

Cardiogenic Shock

CARDIOGENIC SHOCK IS CAUSED BY A DECREASED
pumping ability of the heart that results in a shock-like
state with insufficient blood perfusion to organs and
tissues. During cardiogenic shock, systolic blood pressure is
less than 90 mmHg for greater than one hour and not
responsive to IV fluids. The cardiac index is less than
2.2 L/minute/m2, and the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure
is greater than 18 mmHg. Patients usually have
clouded consciousness and cold extremities.

I. CAUSES
Acute myocardial infarction is the most common cause of
cardiogenic shock. Other causes of cardiogenic shock are
given in Table 1. The complete occlusion of a coronary
artery by a clot causes death of an area of heart muscle that
is supplied by that blood vessel and its branches. If a very
large area of heart muscle is involved, the general pumping
capability of the heart is severely compromised. Because
dead myocardium cannot contract, blood cannot be
effectively ejected out of the left ventricle into the aorta
[see Fig. 1 in the chapter Anatomy of the Heart and
Circulation). Blood is held up in the lungs and fluid
accumulates in air sacs causing pulmonary edema which
results in severe shortness of breath. Because blood cannot
be ejected from the heart, the blood pressure falls
drastically. When more than 40% of the heart muscle is
involved, cardiogenic shock often occurs.

II. PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
In general terms shock is a clinical state in which target
organ–tissue perfusion is inadequate to supply vital substrates
and remove the metabolic waste. Inadequate cellular
oxygenation leads to marked generalized impairment of
cellular function and multiorgan failure.
The heart tries to contract more vigorously in the face of
this catastrophic event; the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone
system is activated and causes severe vasoconstriction
in an attempt to increase blood pressure (see Fig. 1 in
the chapter Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/
Angiotensin Receptor Blockers), but over time the hypercontractility
of the heart ceases. This occurs because there
is utilization of glucose over fatty acids, loss of Krebs
cycle intermediates, and depletion of substrate required for
ATP production.

Figure 1 illustrates the pathophysiology of shock.
Because forward flow of blood is severely retarded, blood
returned to the heart from veins of the body and from the
lungs cannot be accommodated in a heart that is already
full of blood. Blood then backs up into the venous
circulation of the neck and in the lungs. This pressure of
blood returning to the heart is referred to as an increased
filling pressure (Fig. 1). It is easy to visualize that the shock
state may occur if there is no filling pressure as would
occur in severe dehydration or severe blood loss (i.e., the
tank has no gas).

Basically cardiogenic shock results from profound
reduction in cardiac output. This is usually caused by
marked reduction of left or right ventricular systolic function,
despite adequate ventricular filling pressures, and
there is a failure of compensatory vasoconstrictive mechanisms
that are overwhelmed by inappropriate vasodilation
in large, nonvital vascular beds. Thus this deprivescritical
areas like the heart ,brain, and kidney of perfusion.
Hochman points out that data from the shock trial and
registry indicate that cardiogenic shock is often not
simply due to extensive myocardial infarction with pump
failure, ‘‘but also involves inflammatory mediators. These
mediators induce nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) expression,
increasing nitric oxide (NO) and peroxynitrite levels,
resulting which results in further myocardial dysfunction
and failure of an appropriate peripheral circulatory
response.’’

III. MANAGEMENT
Most patients require an intra-aortic balloon pump and
IV vasopressor drugs to support blood perfusion to organs
and tissues. The opening of the obstructed artery using
balloon angioplasty with the insertion of stents has
improved survival. Because approximately 40% of cardiogenic
shock patients have occlusions in three coronary
arteries, emergency coronary artery bypass surgery is the
only measure that has improved survival in this group.
In the SHOCK trial, the overall 30-day mortality rate
was 47% in patients undergoing emergency revascularization
versus 56% in the medical stabilization group.
This improvement was maintained at the six-month
follow up.

IV. PERSPECTIVE AND RESEARCH
IMPLICATIONS
The incidence of cardiogenic shock will not decrease until
the main cause, which is obstruction to coronary arteries
by atheromatous plaque and thrombosis, is arrested.
Thrombolytic therapy is of little value and revascularization
with balloon angioplasty and coronary bypass surgery
can only be undertaken in special centers. The SHOCK
trial only studied 300 patients. More research is required
to assess if we could develop cardioactive agents to protect
the myocardium from necrosis during an occlusion of
a coronary artery.

For more information visit Jigfo.com, the no.1 source of information.

Brugada Syndrome


PEDRO AND JOSEP BRUGADA DESCRIBED A
cardiac condition in 1992 characterized by a typical
ECG pattern and a high incidence of sudden death particularly
in younger individuals. The Brugada syndrome is a
congenital disorder of sodium cardiac channel function. It
is prevalent in Southeast Asia. Rare deaths have occurred
during sleep sometimes associated with nightmares. The
syndrome has variety of names in different countries:
Bangungut (scream followed by sudden death) in the
Philippines, Lai Tai in Thailand, and Pokkuri (unexpected
death at night) in Japan. Apparently in Thailand
unexplained sudden cardiac death is the leading cause of
death in young men, and approximately 40% of these
patients have a family history of sudden deaths; an
estimated incidence of 1 sudden death per 1000 persons
per year. The Brugada VCG phenotype has been estimated
to be up to 1.4% in Japan The typical ECG pattern
may be intermittent, and is found in 0.15% of Japanese
adults, which is associated with a greater then 50-fold
increase in the risk of unexpected death; the incidence
is reportedly ninefold higher in Japanese men than in
women.

Although much less common than in south–eastern Asia
this syndrome is not rare in western countries and in North
America.

I. CLINICAL FEATURES
Symptoms, particularly syncope and sudden death, usually
appear between the ages of 40 and 50. These symptoms
occur with no warning. In one study of 163 patients in
which ventricular fibrillation occurred in 22% percent, the
following observations were made: 12:1 male to female
ratio, 58% of Asian origin, and mean age at first abnormal
heart rhythm detected was 22–65, but occurred more often
in the 40–50 age group. Most of these patients had a
family history of syncope, sudden death, or abnormal
ECG changes.

In Brugada syndrome sudden cardiac death is often
preceded by several episodes of syncope. Brugada syndrome
is believed to cause approximately 30% of all cases
of ventricular fibrillation of unknown cause. Remme et al.
reported that the vast majority of patients showed no
evidence of structural heart disease but the electrical system
has a minor derangement, probably in the bundle of
His–Purkinje electrical conducting system that in some
individuals can trigger ventricular fibrillation and death.
In these patients the ECG is diagnostic and shows a
distinctive type of right bundle branch block. The ST
segment is elevated in chest leads V1, V2, and V3 where
the right bundle branch pattern is usually seen. Figures 1–5
show the ECG tracing in a patient with Brugada syndrome.
The elevated ST segment has a curious convex
curve or a coved and saddle back shape. The ECG is
abnormal but the heart is structurally normal. Antiarrhythmic
agents are not effective in preventing ventricular
fibrillation in these patients and implantation of a cardioverter
defibrillator is advisable to prevent sudden death.

II. PERSPECTIVE
The exact mechanism of the electrocardiographic changes
and the development of ventricular fibrillation and sudden
death remain undetermined. Electrically active cardiac cells
possess sodium channels; an outward sodium current is
counterbalanced by an inward sodium current. It appears
that in this syndrome the inward current is attenuated
and some of the electrocardiographic features can be partly
explained based on changes in sodium currents. The
syndrome is a disorder of sodium cardiac channel function
that triggers the electrocardiographic changes and
malignant arrhythmias, particularly ventricular fibrillation.
Mutations in a gene responsible for the sodium channel
have been identified in some families with this syndrome.
More than three different mutations on the cardiac
sodium channel gene SCN5A on chromosome 3 have been
described. Mutations on other genes are being sought.
Further research is required in this area and its results
are of extreme importance to prevent deaths in young
individuals.

For more information visit Jigfo.com, the no.1 source of information.

Blood Pressure


THE HEART PUMPS BLOOD DIRECTLY INTO
blood vessels called arteries, which are like a series of
pipes. The narrower the artery, the greater the resistance or
impedance to the flow of blood; therefore, the heart must
pump with greater force. The amount of force the blood is
pumped from the heart through the arteries is the blood
pressure.

I. HISTORICAL REVIEW
A. The Beginning of Sphygmomanometry
Reverend Stephen Hales is the father of sphygmomanometry.
During his seven-year course in theology at Corpus
Christi (Bene’t College), Cambridge in 1733, mathematics
and science were added to basic theology and philosophy.
It was at Cambridge where he initially experimented on
pressure, resistance, and flow. He later became curate of
Teddington outside of London, received his BA, and was
awarded an MA at Cambridge and Bachelor of Divinity
from Oxford.

Some years later he commenced his experimental scientific
work on the circulation of blood. He conducted
more than 25 experiments on dogs and horses. Figure 1 is
an artist’s impression of Hale’s experiments to determine
the blood pressure of a horse. His observations were published
in Volume II of the Statical Essays in 1733:
. . . in the summer I caused the mare to be tied down
alive on her back; having laid open the left crural artery
about three inches from her belly, I inserted into it a
brass pipe whose bore was one sixth of an inch in
diameter. . . . I fixed a glass tube of nearly the same
diameter which was 9 feet in length: then untying the
ligature of the artery, the blood rose in the tube 8 feet 3
inches perpendicular above the level of the left ventricle
of the heart;. . . when it was at its full height it would
rise and fall at and after each pulse 2, 3, or 4
inches . . . .’’

Figure 2 is a page from Haemastatics showing his
measurement for correlating blood volume with the blood
pressure. After this, it appears that there were no advances
for the next 100 years.

B. Further Advances
Poiseuille was a physician and a physicist who introduced
the mercury manometer to the world in 1833. He won the
gold medal of the Royal Academy of Medicine for his
doctoral designation of the management of arterial blood
pressure by means of the mercury manometer connected
to a cannula that was inserted directly into an artery.
Around 1881 Samuel von Basch further advanced blood
pressure measurements with the use of an inflatable
rubber bag with water (see Fig. 3). In 1889, Potain substituted
air for water and used a rubber bulb for compression
of the pulse. He recorded the pressure with a
portable aneroid manometer, but the measurements were
unreliable.

C. Advancements Leading to Current Methods
Scipione Riva-Rocci, in 1896, reported a noninvasive
method of obtaining blood pressure that led to our current
technique (see Fig. 4). He reported the appearance
of definite and pronounced oscillations in the column
of mercury which coincided with the appearance of the
radial pulse. This was taken as the systolic pressure. The
diastolic pressure was recorded when the level of the
mercury column changed from large to small oscillations.
A major defect in Riva-Rocci’s technique was the use of
a narrow 5-cm arm band. German pathologist Friedrich
Von Recklinghausen later corrected this defect by introducing
a 12-cm wide arm band in 1901.

By 1905, Nicolai Korotkoff further advanced Riva-
Rocci’s ideas. In 1898 Korotkoff obtained his medical
degree from the University of Moscow and pursued
a career in vascular surgery. As a surgeon, he often used
a stethoscope to differentiate between a solid mass and
arterial aneurysm. He was therefore concerned with sounds
made by arteries.

His main conclusions were derived from the simple
observation that a perfectly constricted artery under
normal conditions does not emit any sounds. Thus, he
proposed the sound method for measuring blood pressure
on humans. He used the Riva-Rocci sleeve on the middle
third of the arm. At first he observed no sounds, but as the
mercury in the manometer dropped to a certain height
the first short faint tones appeared. He called these tones
the maximum blood pressure. When all sounds disappeared,
the manometer reading reflected the minimum
blood pressure. The accuracy of Korotkoff’s ‘‘sound
method’’ has stood the test of time. It is presently used
worldwide with acceptable clinical accuracy; nothing has
changed except for a varied cuff size relative to the arm
width.

II. SYSTOLIC AND DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE
Everyone has a blood pressure, but what does that mean?
The pressure in the arteries when the heart contracts
(systole) is called systolic blood pressure. This is usually
less than 140 millimeters of mercury (mmHg). The
pressure in the arteries when the heart is relaxed (diastole)
is called diastolic pressure, and this is usually less than
90 mmHg in adults.

Here is another way of looking at blood pressure. Each
contraction of the heart causes blood to be pushed
(propelled) through the arteries in the form of a pulse
wave; thus the flow of blood in the arteries is pulsatile.
A wave must have a crest and a trough. The crest is caused
when the heart contracts (systole) and is the highest
pressure. Systolic blood pressure coincides with the first
Korotkoff sounds heard with the stethoscope over the
brachial artery at the cubital fossa just below the level of
the inflated cuff on the arm. The trough is caused when
the heart relaxes (diastole), producing the lowest pressure,
or diastolic pressure at which instant all Korotkoff sounds
disappear, and no sounds are heard with the stethoscope.
Resistance in the arteries against which the heart must
pump is called the total vascular resistance. If the total
vascular resistance increases, blood pressure increases. This
vascular resistance is increased when the arteries are
constricted by disease, aging, drugs, or naturally occurring
chemicals in the body such as adrenaline and noradrenaline.
Sudden alarming stress, fright, and situations that
provoke sudden anxiety may cause secretion of excess
adrenaline and noradrenaline, which causes sudden and
considerable elevation in systolic blood pressure. In these
situations the systolic blood pressure, which may have been
135 mmHg, may shoot up suddenly, and within minutes
be 175–200 mmHg.

The amount of blood expelled by the heart into the
arteries in one minute is called the cardiac output and is
about 5 L/minute. Blood pressure is equal to the total
vascular resistance multiplied by the cardiac output.
Hypertension is the medical term for high blood pressure
and has nothing to do with excessive nervous tension.
High blood pressure in individuals older than age 18
is defined as a systolic blood pressure of greater than
140 mmHg and/or a diastolic blood pressure of greater
than 90 mmHg based on the average of two or more
readings taken at each of two or more visits after an initial
screening (average of at least four readings taken days or
weeks apart).

III. CLASSIFICATION
The classification of blood pressure (BP) for adults age
18 years and older as given in the Seventh Report of the
Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection,
Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure
(JNC 7) is as follows:
 Normal: BP<120>160; >100

IV. NORMAL FLUCTUATIONS IN BLOOD PRESSURE
A. Marked Variability
Marked variability in blood pressure is normal. It varies
from minute to minute and from day to day like the waves
of a sea, fluctuating with the force of the prevailing winds.
Blood pressure is different at night, during sleep, and the
early morning, fluctuating considerably during the day.
The systolic pressure may differ from 5 to 15 mmHg
during these moments.

Ambulatory blood pressure recordings may be needed in
some individuals to verify the correct levels of hypertension.
The blood pressure readings in a doctor’s office or
clinics are often higher than they are in a home setting.
Blood pressure readings taken at home are important,
but it is necessary to have the pressure recorded outside
the home in different settings to arrive at conclusive
documentation that high blood pressure is indeed present.
The variability of the blood pressure recorded on repeated
measurements, both at a single visit and on separate
occasions at a clinic or physician’s office, is much greater
than most doctors and patients realize. Individuals are
often falsely labeled normotensive or hypertensive. Because
of the lifelong commitment to antihypertensive medications,
the diagnosis must be carefully established, particularly
with borderline hypertension. Because of this marked
variability in recorded blood pressure from day to day,
individuals with borderline hypertension may require
observation for up to two years before a correct diagnosis
is made and the commencement of medications.

B. Daytime and Nighttime Variability
Daytime blood pressure is mainly determined by the
degree of physical and mental activity and is under the
control of baroreflexes that operate through adjustments in
heart rate and peripheral vascular resistance. The usual fall
in blood pressure at night is a result of sleep and inactivity
rather than the time of day; pressure falls during the
day if an individual sleeps. Blood pressure may fall
10–20 mmHg during sleep as the baroreflex sensitivity
decreases sympathetic nervous activity.
There is a usual abrupt rise in blood pressure within
minutes of arising in the early morning caused by
catecholamine release; it is a critical period that coincides
with an increased incidence of sudden cardiac death,
stroke, and myocardial infarction. An increase in catecholamines
increases blood pressure, which causes increased
stickiness of platelets that may aggregate and predispose
the formation of clots in coronary arteries or arteries that
supply the brain. The activity of the heart increases as more
oxygen is required to cope with the stimulation caused by
the release of catecholamines.

Beta-blocking drugs counteract the deleterious effects of
catecholamines, and they have been shown in sound,
randomized clinical trials to decrease the early morning
incidence of sudden deaths and fatal and nonfatal myocardial
infarction. These sudden deaths are not prevented
by aspirin or antiplatelet agents. This information is probably
known to less than 25% of practicing doctors
worldwide.

C. White-Coat Hypertension
The definition of white-coat hypertension awaits clarification.
The prevalence in a population of untreated hypertensive
patients has been reported to vary from 12% to as
high as 53%. It is estimated, however, that about 10% of
these individuals have genuine hypertension; they do not
require medication and their hypertension should be
defined by blood pressures taken outside the physician’s
office. Home measurements and the use of finger blood
pressure measurements should be used.
The acute elevation of blood pressure in the office
setting is presumably a conditional reflex that increases
sympathetic nervous arousal each time the blood pressure
is taken by the physician. In a study of 292 patients with
diastolic blood pressures ranging from 90 to 104 mmHg
during multiple physician’s visits over a period of
6 years, 21% had persistently normal readings during a
24-hambulatory recording.

White-coat hypertension has been observed in more
than 20% of individuals diagnosed as hypertensive,
including elderly patients with systolic hypertension.
In one study approximately 50% of patients who were
not believed to be responding to medications based on
physician’s blood pressure readings were shown on
ambulatory monitoring to have controlled blood pressures.
Overuse of medications in this large population of
individuals is a real problem.

D. Pseudohypertension
Pseudohypertension is a false reading of high blood pressure.
It is not unusual for this to occur in patients with
arteriolosclerosis, calcification, and diffuse hardening of
the arteries, particularly in the upper limbs. With hardening
of the arteries, the rigid, pipe-like arteries resist
compression by the sphygmomanometer cuff, and the
pressure in the cuff wrapped around the arm fails to
constrict and collapse the brachial artery. Because of this,
blood continues to flow through the artery into the
forearm causing a false high reading. A reading in the range
of 180 to 220 is not unusual.

Pseudohypertension should be excluded in elderly
individuals whose brachial arteries characteristically feel
rigid and pipe-like and in individuals who have no effects
of hypertension after several years of abnormal readings
such as evidence of hypertension in the retina or cardiovascular
or renal disease. Pseudohypertension may also
be suspected in these individuals with blood pressure
apparently resistant to therapy and in those who develop
dizziness and lightheadedness related to change in posture.
Recordings over a period of weeks in the home, particularly
with a simple finger blood pressure measurement,
should resolve the diagnosis of pseudohypertension in
virtually all patients. An automatic oscillometric recorder
may be required to verify the blood pressures, and rarely,
a direct intra-arterial reading may be necessary.

E. Home Measurements
Home measurements of blood pressure are crucial for the
adequate management of hypertension in more than 33%
of hypertensives. A record of home measurements verified
by measurements outside the physician’s office is an
important strategy to prevent overmedication.
Measurements in the home have been shown to give
virtually all of the information provided by ambulatory
blood pressure monitoring. The home or ambulatory
readings have been shown in studies to be comparable,
reproducible, and considerably lower than office readings.
Home blood pressure measurements are strongly indicated
for the following:
 To assist the physician with the diagnosis of borderline
or stage 1 hypertension (see stages given above in
Section III)
 To exclude short term hypertension that may occur for
a few months because of stressful situations at work or
at home and do not require lifelong medications
 To exclude white-coat hypertension
 To exclude pseudohypertension in the elderly
 To monitor response to therapy to avoid the addition
of another antihypertensive agent to achieve control,
thus preventing overmedication for so-called uncontrolled
blood pressure in an office setting

V. FINGER CUFF METHOD OF PENAZ
This method works on the principle of the unloaded
arterial wall. Arterial pulsation in a finger is detected
by a photoplethysmograph under a pressure cuff. The
plethysmograph’s output drives a servoloop which changes
the cuff pressure to maintain constant output so that the
artery is held in the partially opened state. The pressure
oscillations in the cuff are measured and resemble the
intra-arterial pressure wave in most individuals tested.
Finometer and Portapres recorders are available and are
useful for the diagnosis of pseudohypertension that may
occur in the elderly who may be overmedicated because
of the finding of high blood pressure readings obtained
with the usual cuff method.

VI. TECHNIQUE AND PITFALLS OF MEASUREMENT
The cuff size must the appropriate for the blood pressure
measurement to be accurate. The arm and the mercury or
aneroid manometer must be at the same level as the heart.
The patient should be seated for about 5 minutes with
the back supported and with the arm supported at heart
level. If the arm is not supported than readings are
approximately 8 mmHg higher than those taken with
arm supported. If the back is not supported, readings may
be as much as 10 mmHg higher because of the isometric
exertion needed to support the body and arm.
Inflate the bladder quickly to a pressure about
20mmHg above the systolic pressure as recognized by
disappearance of the radial pulse. Inflating the bladder too
slowly may cause errors. Deflate at a rate of 2–4 mmHg
per second; a slower rate of deflation may cause false high
readings. If a second blood pressure reading is to be taken,
the cuff must be completely emptied of air and the arm
band removed and reapplied. Many erroneous readings are
obtained if proper technique is not stringently applied.

VII. EFFECTS OF HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE
A moderate degree of hypertension for more than five
years causes severe damage to vital organs. Complications
include:
1. Hypertrophy or enlargement of the heart
2. Heart failure that causes fluid to accumulate in the
lungs and the legs manifested by severe shortness of
breath
3. Myocardial infarction
4. Atrial fibrillation, a serious arrhythmia which causes
palpitations, leads to stroke, and requires a bothersome
commitment to anticoagulation with blood thinners
5. Stroke that may be thrombotic or hemorrhagic
6. Damage to the kidney that leads to renal dysfunction
and renal failure
7. Aortic aneurysm prone to rupture

For more information visit Jigfo.com, the no.1 source of information.